Botanical Observations from Rose Hill Farm

by Claudia

This blog shares some of the botanical observations made at Rose Hill Farm on 23 August 2024 during a 4 hour survey along the route indicated in sky blue in the aerial image below. The numbers indicate locations referenced throughout this blog posting. (Note that we shared habitat images from Rose Hill Farm in a blog posted 21 June 2024; Conrad posted about insects on 12 July 2024 and Will about birds on 16 November 2024.

Route of botanical survey on 23 August 2024

I started my walk-around from the parking area along the driveway back towards the entry gate.

Entry ally to Rose Hill Farm with a weeping willow (Salix cf. babylonica x alba) and Red and Sugar Maples (Acer rubrum and A. saccharum) beyond (seen from #1).

Along the driveway is a shrubland that contains both Tree-of-Heaven (Ailanthus altissima; left on both images below) and Staghorn Sumac (Rhus typhina; right on both images below). Both have pinnate, “feather-like” leaves, composed of a midrib with leaflets arranged opposite each other along both sides. However, the margin of the leaflets is toothed like a saw blade in the Sumac, while the margin of the Tree-of-Heaven leaflets is almost smooth, with just a couple of blunt teeth at the very base. Furthermore, the two species have very different smells: the Sumac has a (to me) very agreeable, aromatic, resinous smell, while the smell of Tree-of-Heaven reminds many people of rancid peanut butter.

Tree-of-Heaven (Ailanthus altissima; left on both images) and Staghorn Sumac (Rhus typhina; right on both images)

South of the driveway is a small wet meadow (#2) that supports a diverse plant community, composed of native and non-native species, such as Smooth Goldenrod (Solidago gigantea; yellow flowers) and Purple Loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria; deep pink flowers), respectively. I quickly tallied a total of 40 (!) species in this very small meadow.

Species-rich wet meadow south of the driveway (#2)

Just west of this wet meadow, I found a very small patch of forest on and surrounding a rock outcrop (#3). At the forest edge, there were several individuals of two native shrub species not seen anywhere else during my survey at Rose Hill (or any of the other eight farms surveyed this summer). This image shows Prickly Ash (Zanthoxylum americanum), which has pinnate leaves and thorny branches. Prickly Ash is one of the host plants for the caterpillars of Giant Swallowtail butterflies. Conrad shared a picture of a Giant Swallowtail he had seen at Rose Hill in his blog from 12 July 2024, but we don’t know yet, if they are actually successfully reproducing here or if an occasional individual flies in from further south.

Prickly Ash (Zanthoxylum americanum; #3)

Bladdernut (Staphylea trifolia), which grew right next to the Prickly Ash, has leaves composed of three leaflets (similar to clovers) and unique, three-chambered, bladder-like fruits. Both of these species tend to occur in calcium-rich soils.

Bladdernut (Staphylea trifolia; #3)

I am no geologist, but the outcrop (#3) might well be some sort of limestone or related rock that is rich in calcium.

Suspected limestone (or other calcium-rich rock) outcrop (#3)

False Solomon’s-seal (Maianthemum racemosum) also grew at the base of the rock, which was surrounded by large trees, including Sugar Maple, American Basswood, Red Oak, and American Elm.

False Solomon’s-seal (Maianthemum racemosum; #3)

I found a very different, much younger forest north of the wood chip piles (#7). It still had the remnants of Red Cedar (Juniperus virginiana), which are early-successional trees that often grow on abandoned farm fields or pastures. As the historical aerial photo in Conrad’s blog from 12 July 2024 shows, this area used to be orchard 80 years ago.

Red Cedars tend to die naturally as they get shaded out by taller trees. However, the Red Cedars in this forest might have been intentionally cut, presumably to avoid serving as hosts for the Cedar-Apple Rust (Gymnosporangium juniperi-virginianae), a fungal pathogen of apples, that needs two hosts to complete its life cycle, a Red Cedar and an apple or hawthorn.

Fallen or felled Red Cedar in young forest (#7)

Lower down in the forest along a small stream, ferns such as Royal Fern (Osmunda regalis; bottom right in the image) and Cinnamon Fern (Osmundastrum cinnamomeum; center of image) grew lush in the moist soil.

Royal Fern (Osmunda regalis) and Cinnamon Fern (Osmundastrum cinnamomeum) in young forest (#7) by stream

Back up along the forest edge (# 6), Virgin’s-bower (Clematis virginiana), which is a native vine whose stems are not woody and die back each winter, were in full bloom.

Virgin’s-bower (Clematis virginiana; #6)

The pond by the farm house (#8) had a narrow band of unmowed vegetation, which harbored some native plant species not seen anywhere else on the farm during our survey.

Pond (#8) with narrow band of unmowed vegetation

During my walk around Rose Hill Farm, I noticed New England Aster (Symphyotrichum novae-angliae) only at the shore of this pond. It was visited by a native bee.

New England Aster (Symphyotrichum novae-angliae; #8)

The damselflies were mating and laying their eggs in the pond. These little guys greatly benefit from the emergent vegetation which provides perches. They also benefit from aquatic vegetation in the pond, because it provides habitat for their aquatic larvae. Aquatic vegetation is especially important for dragonfly and damselfly larvae, when predatory fish or amphibians also live in the pond.

Mating damselflies (#8)

A big patch of the invasive Common Reed (Phragmites australis) grew in a swale (#9) draining into the pond.

Common Reed (Phragmites australis) in a swale (#9)

Another swale (#10) near the solar panels had unmowed wet meadow vegetation composed of many native species, including Common Boneset (Eupatorium perfoliatum; white flowers) and Spotted Jewelweed (Impatiens capensis; orange flowers), which were buzzing with insects.

Unmowed wet meadow in swale (#10)

The upper end of the same swale (#10) had a more diverse plant community, including native cattails (Typha sp.), Early Goldenrod (Solidago juncea), Awl Aster (Symphyotrichum pilosum var. pilosum), and Black-eyed Susan (Rudbeckia hirta).

Upper part of wet meadow in swale (#10)

Near the fenceline, I encountered a shrub thicket (#11) with two different species of willow, Heart-leaved Willow (Salix eriocephala; left) and Bebb’s Willow (Salix bebbiana; right). Both of these willows have catkins that serve as important early season pollen sources for bees.

Heart-leaved Willow (Salix eriocephala; left) and Bebb’s Willow (Salix bebbiana; right) in shrub swamp (#11)

The thicket also had a Silky Dogwood (Cornus amomum), with its metallic-blue fruits displayed on reddish branches.

Silky Dogwood (Cornus amomum; #11)

Circling back towards the buildings, I passed by a dry hillside which had been left unmowed (#12). The vegetation was a mix of common native species, including several goldenrods (Smooth, Tall, and Early) and Common Milkweed (Asclepias syriaca), with non-native species, including Spotted Knapweed (Centaurea jacea) and Wild Carrot (Daucus carota).

Unmowed dry hillside (#12) with a mix of common native and non-native wildflowers

Another unmowed, dry slope east of the parking lot (#15) had several less common native plants, including Purpletop (Tridens flavus), Purple Love Grass (Eragrostis spectabilis), and Whorled Milkwort (Polygala verticillata). I did not see any of these species anywhere else at Rose Hill Farm.

Another unmowed dry hillside (#15) with some unusual native plant species

The shore of the pond (# 16) south of the driveway had a broad band of unmowed, diverse vegetation including the uncommon native Swamp Rose (Rosa palustris), which we didn’t observe anywhere else on Rose Hill or at any of the other farms surveyed this season. Note also some “blonde” clumps of the native warm-season grass Little Bluestem (Schizachyrium scoparium), usually found in dry soils.

Band of unmowed shoreline of a pond (#16)

Along the south fence, south of the Blueberries, I was excited to find a beautiful and diverse wet meadow (# 18). Here, you see the native Spotted Joe-Pye-weed (Eutrochium maculatum; light pink) mix with the invasive Purple Loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria; dark pink). However, a closer look revealed many less conspicuous native wetland plants that we did not see anywhere else at Rose Hill. For example, Conrad included images of Yellow Stargrass (Hypoxis hirsuta) and Square-stemmed Monkeyflower (Mimulus ringens) from this wet meadow in his insect post on 12 July 2024

Diverse, unmowed wet meadow (# 18)

Another plant unique to this area was Groundnut (Apios americana), a native vine in the pea family which is occasionally found in wet, open areas. It has pinnate leaves with five leaflets and dense conical clusters of pea-shaped flowers of a very unusual, pink/purple/red-brown color. Most plants of this species in our region never produce fruits (but see our blog on the Hudson Valley Seed Company for an exception and explanation). The tubers of this species are edible and Native Americans seem to have sometimes cultivated Groundnut.

Groundnut (Apios americana; #18)

Another was Virginia Mountain-mint (Pycnanthemum virginianum), which is an uncommon native mint much visited by a large variety of pollinators.

Virginia Mountain-mint (Pycnanthemum virginianum; #18)

Finally, New York Ironweed (Vernonia noveboracensis) was also unique to this wet meadow. It is a member of the aster family, which seems to be more common further south in the Hudson Valley and is rarely found growing wild in our region.

New York Ironweed (Vernonia noveboracensis; #18)

East of the Blueberries was another dry slope (# 19) with unmowed vegetation. It was fun to see how each of these unmowed slopes supported a slightly different vegetation. This one had a lot of Little Bluestem (Schizachyrium scoparium) and Early Goldenrod (Solidago juncea), but also a variety of other native and non-native plant species.

Another example of an unmowed dry slope (#19) with its own unique plant composition

The apples nearby (# 20) were getting ripe and the unmowed strips of vegetation in the tree rows were still alive with flowers, here mostly Wild Carrot (Daucus carota).

Unmowed and flower-rich strips of vegetation within the rows of orchard trees (#20)

Finally, another unmowed slope with plenty of native goldenrods and European weeds in bloom, next to a field of seeded Sunflowers. With several large areas throughout the orchard left unmowed and some annual flower plantings, floral resources for pollinators (the Honey Bees kept on site, as well as wild native bees), as well as other insects, should be available throughout the season. And Will reminds us in his post on the birds of Rose Hill Farm (16 November 2024) just how important these scruffy-looking, “feral” areas throughout the farm are for our feathered friends.

A last example of a flower-rich, unmowed dry slope (#21)

The Birds of Rose Hill

By Will

Peruse any aerial photograph of the Hudson Valley from the 1960s and you will see field after field dotted with fruit trees, their neat rows show up as pointillist parcels in even the most blurry photos. There used to be a lot of commercial orchards in the Hudson Valley. Several successful commercial orchards still remain in what is today a very difficult and competitive agro-economy, but New York is no longer the Big Apple and much of its market share has been overtaken by the irrigated apples of Washington state, New Zealand, and other far-flung places. The regional commercial orchards that persist today are either ruthlessly efficient or creative in their direct marketing to tourists and visitors.

This photo (Livingston, Columbia County) shows the extent to which orchards once dominated “hedgerow to hedgerow” on many farms. 1965.

To be truthful, most commercial orchards in the Hudson Valley do not rise to the top of my list as places to see birds, which is why the bird diversity of Rose Hill was a refreshing surprise.

For birds to survive they need places to roost and rest, insects in May to replenish their exhausted bodies after typically long migrations, places to build nests free from disturbance, and still more insects in June and July to feed their rapidly developing offspring. Most commercial orchards are some of the most intensively managed farmscapes in the Hudson Valley. Many pesticides (both organic and conventional) are necessary to raise the high-quality fruit that consumers demand. It’s been over 50 years since Joni Mitchell proudly sang that she can live with “spots on her apples” but we have a long way to go to convince most American consumers that the tradeoff is worth it for a healthier ecosystem. Our changing regional climate, with its warmer springs still punctuated with snap freezes, and new invasive pests in the pipeline (Brown-Marmorated Stinkbug the newest arrival and Spotted Lanternfly at our doorstep) don’t make things any easier.

I’ll let Rose Hill speak for themselves on their growing practices and philosophy, but as a visiting farmer and ornithologist, a few key features stood out:

  1. Mechanical (rather than chemical) removal of weeds under trees at a reduced rate that provide a lot of structural plant diversity within orchard rows.
  2. Reduced spray schedule and use of non- or less-toxic spray alternatives
  3. Retention of landforms in orchard blocks (vegetated shale ridges, for example)
  4. Adjacent blocks of native vegetation.

The vegetated strips between trees that cannot be reached by mowers provides spaces for pollinators, and for insect prey that birds depend upon. This structural heterogeneity is closer to the appearance of Hudson Valley orchards in the 19th and early 20th Centuries.

Rather than bulldozing and infilling shale ridges, Rose Hill has left them in place providing important micro shelters and feeding zones for birds.

The savannah-like structure of orchards actually attract a few species of birds who preferentially nest in the grassy matrix of trees.

I find that one of the most common orchard birds, which nests directly in fruit trees, can thrive when spray programs are kept to a minimum. The Eastern Kingbird is a type of flycatcher that builds a grassy cup in the fork of a tree branch that looks like a Disney cartoon of a nest. They are famously aggressive towards other birds and mammals (but oddly, not humans). On a spring day when you look up and see some smaller songbird attacking and chasing a Red-tailed Hawk and think, wow, that bird has chutzpah, chances are that it’s an Eastern Kingbird.

Chris Franks shared this image of a local Eastern Kingbird. These birds perch conspicuously on wires and the tops of trees sallying forth for large flying insects. They have a white band on their tails that identifies the bird in flight even from a distance without binoculars.

Cedar Waxwings often nest in orchards as well. On my farm, I typically see them nesting in plums and early peaches, constructing their nests just as the harvest is winding down. They rarely bother to eat peaches and large fruit but can be considered a management challenge in cherry and small-berry crops. There are plenty of native species of fruit that these birds frequent, and yes, as the name implies, they eat Eastern Red Cedar (juniper) berries, as well as serviceberries, wild grape, hawthorn, and winter berry. Many fruit-eating birds separate the flesh and seeds in their crops and regurgitate the seeds, but waxwing digestion shunts both the pulp and seeds through their bodies and they are a key species for spreading many fruiting trees and shrubs (they can also spread less desirable invasive species such as Japanese Honeysuckle and Multiflora Rose). Sometimes in the fall when fruits such as wild grape partially ferment and produce alcohol the birds can become intoxicated and fly awkwardly.

The “waxy” red tips on the wings, yellow tail band and raccoon mask of the Cedar Waxwing are unmistakable. Their song, if you can call it much of one, is an almost an inaudible high pitched trill. Photo: Chris Franks

The aptly named Orchard Oriole, seen in the apricot orchard at Rose Hill, has a brick-red chest (unlike the tangerine orange of the far more common Baltimore Oriole). They feed on fruit, flowers, nectar, and insects and unusual for orioles, sometimes nest communally in appropriate habitat. The 60-plus-year-old records of the Alan Devoe Bird Club has shown this species increasing in our area for unknown reasons. It may be due to the current successional sweet spot in the Hudson Valley with many young forests and abandoned orchards that provide the structure this species favors without the intensive pesticide use. I never find them in modern commercial orchards and its presence at Rose Hill was a surprise, although my visit in mid July is at the end of their breeding cycle and this individual could have been a migrant on its way back to Central America.

Marian Sole shared this image of a local male Orchard Oriole. Like all orioles, it has a rich lilting complex song.

This lightly managed section of the orchard edge (with native vegetation on the opposite side of the fence) was a “birdy” section of the farm and contained a Common Yellowthroat nest with young.

This female Common Yellowthroat foraged for insects in a young planting of plums. Close enough for my iPhone!

Common Yellowthroats are small yellow-olive warblers that nest in brushy tangles and like to be near water. They are a common bird in our area the summer and their ‘whitchity-whitchity-whitchity’ song is a familiar sound if you train your ear to recognize it. They frequently struggle with brood parasitism from another native species, the Brown-headed Cowbirds. Cowbirds do not construct their own nests, but rather like Eurasian Cuckoos, they lay a single egg in the nests of other birds and abandon them for the host bird to raise. Their hatching offspring grow at a fast rate and therefore elbow the lion’s share of the incoming insect food from parents which seem instinctually inclined to shove food into any open mouth regardless of species.

This is a two-way evolutionary race, however, and some populations of Common Yellowthroat have learned to recognize the cowbird’s egg and will build a layer of grass overtop it to isolate it. If that fails, they may abandon the nest and attempt to renest completely at a great cost of energy. The North American Breeding Bird Survey has documented a 26 percent loss of Common Yellowthroats in North America since 1966, probably due to habitat loss. Farms can be essential places for these birds since the unmowed edges, unused fields or the vegetation around irrigation ponds can be more than enough habitat for this species to successfully raise young. A few have learned to use more heavily vegetated suburban yards. You don’t need a lot of land to attract and retain this species, but they can’t eke out a living on mowed lawns dotted with ornamental shrubs–they need a patch of rank growth.

Rose Hill has a wonderful planting of blueberries as part of their U-Pick offerings. The mature plants were heavy with berries on the July morning I visited and although they were not open for customers, more than 30 birds helped themselves to the berries in the patch. American Robins, Gray Catbirds, and Baltimore Orioles dominated the flock, with a smattering of Eastern Towhees, Northern Mockingbird, and a Brown Thrasher. I’ve talked to growers with divergent views on netting berries to prevent birds, some swear it’s essential and others feel there is plenty to go around. I’ve found that birds can nearly wipe out small plantings of a 50 bushes or less, but larger blocks seem to satiate the robbers and leave plenty for us.

This planting of blueberries hosted 5-6 species of birds attracted to the free fruit

The former name of the Eastern Towhee is the aptly named Rufous-Sided Towhee. Related to sparrows, this is a common bird of scrublands and early successional forests. They scratch through leaf litter with a two foot hop, pouncing on exposed insects. They commonly add fruit to their diet as well

In a month these sunflowers will attract pollinators and if left to go to seed, a calorie-rich seed for a variety of birds

So many of the fruits that we expect and enjoy at commercial orchards — from peaches to apricots, apples to pears, are eurasian imports to North America, non-natives that require a lot of skill and work to bring to fruitfulness and profit. That Rose Hill has managed to do all of this and still leave patches on their farm to attract native birds and other organisms is deliberate proof that this complex relationship of native and non-native, cultivated and fallow, management and benign neglect, can yield positive ecological relationships. All of us who farm and care about wildlife are searching for our own models to achieve something akin to a balance of what we take from nature and what we leave.

The Birds of Blue Star

By Will

On June 12 I visited Blue Star Farm and documented breeding evidence for the following birds:

  • American Robin (Feeding Young)
  • Carolina Wren (Territorial Singing)
  • Chipping Sparrow (Nest with Young)
  • Common Yellowthroat (Territorial Singing)
  • Gray Catbird (Feeding Young)
  • Indigo Bunting (Feeding Young)
  • Killdeer (Fledgling)
  • Pileated Woodpecker (Territorial drumming)
  • Red-eyed Vireo (Territorial Singing)
  • Red-winged Blackbird (Feeding Young)
  • Song Sparrow (Nest with Young)
  • Warbling Vireo (Feeding Young)
  • Wood Thrush (Feeding Young)
  • Yellow Warbler (Feeding Young)

Each section of Blue Star Farm contained unique habitats that hosted a variety of farm and edge-loving species of birds.

Native shrubs such as Staghorn Sumac and large legacy Sugar Maples planted long ago shared space with common non-natives such as Buckthorn, Autumn Olive, and Japanese Honeysuckle (all fruiting shrubs that attract birds) between the farm’s vegetable fields and the main road. Northern Cardinals and Gray Catbirds fed on berries as a Northern Flicker, a yellow-spotted medium woodpecker, investigated nesting cavities in the mature Sugar Maples.

Weediness is a given in most vegetable production systems and they are often the top management challenge. My farm, despite my best efforts to cultivate and hand weed, is often a riot of weeds and I’m slowly learning to make peace with that. Weeds, that catch-all term for an uninvited variety of herbaceous surprises in crop zones, can and often do rob crops of critical moisture and nutrients, but they often include many seed-bearing grasses and forbs that attract insect prey for birds, serve as cover for nesting sites, and feed many ground-feeding sparrows, particularly in fall and winter.

Weeds can be a particular problem for organic farmers because there are limited options available to chemically control them. ‘An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of care,’ is old country advice for dealing with weeds, advising farmers to stay on top of weeds early or else suffer the consequences. A farming manual I have from 1915 has slightly more bellicose advice: “Man must wage continual warfare against weeds should he wish to prevail.”

Just how much weediness a farm can endure depends on the tolerance of the crop and a lot on the time, resources, and philosophy of the grower. I find weeds are most prevalent during dry years (those fast-growing annual weeds seem to thrive in conditions when cultivated crops struggle to keep up). I find that most crops can handle some weediness once they are established and if mowed out shortly after harvest, the weed seed load is mitigated. Like so many things in life, timing is everything.

At Blue Star, A Song Sparrow built a nest in a weedy tangle at the edge of black plastic mulch. An adult foraged for small beetles along the edge of the mulch and noticing me it paused on a spray of Lambsquarter. I stayed motionless until its instinct to feed its young overcame its instinct to be wary of this large mammal. Red-winged Blackbirds perched on the tomato stakes nearby and Chipping Sparrows foraged in the Clover-Wheat cover crops adjacent to the vegetable patch.

I heard a familiar rollicking whistle overhead and noticed a pair of Ospreys flying overhead

The Osprey or Fish Hawk have rough scaled feet perfect for grabbing and holding onto fish plucked from the water

The two fish-eating raptors seemed out of place on a farm, but here in Stuyvesant the Hudson River is a short distance away. Osprey are just starting to nest again in the middle stretches of the Hudson River Valley. They commonly breed downstate and on Long Island and populations nest on lakes at the foothills of the Adirondacks, but for decades they were not present as breeders in the Hudson Valley even as Peregrine Falcons and Bald Eagles (other raptors recovering from DDT poisoning) repopulated historic ranges.

Their absence was long a local ornithological mystery. In the 1980s students from Columbia-Greene Community College erected nesting platforms on the Hudson River to entice them to settle here, but Ospreys are famously uncritical about where they build nests, and lack of nesting sites was probably not the limiting factor. In Florida, they commonly appropriate power line posts, commercial signs, and even flat roofs in developed areas. Perhaps the population just needed to build up over time to infill suitable habitats. Few things authenticate a large body of water better than an Osprey and its dramatic hover and dive to catch fish. I’m always amazed at how quickly local bird populations can wax and wane within the span of a human life.

A single Wild Turkey launched out and flew noisily from a cover crop patch of rye and wheat into the distant woodlot. Turkeys are another great success story in our area, benefiting both from regrowing forests and reintroduction programs. Victims of habitat loss and overhunting in the early 20th Century, they are now common throughout the Hudson Valley and have even adapted to suburban yards. They are one of two native North American birds that have been domesticated (the other is the Muscovy Duck of Mexico). Spanish explorers sent the Turkey back to Europe in the 1500s where they were further domesticated and spread throughout Europe. English colonists a century later brought them back “home” to North America. Wild Turkeys are found in all states except Alaska (yes, there are even wild introduced populations in the upper elevations of Hawaii!).

I hear the gulping distinctive “KOWP KOWP KOWP” song of a Yellow-billed Cuckoo just to the north of the farm in the old woodlot. 2024 has been a banner year for our two native species of Cuckoo, the Black-billed and Yellow-billed as their regional populations follow outbreaks of hairy caterpillars. The large outbreak of Spongy Moth caterpillars in Columbia County and Duchess County has attracted migrating cuckoos to our area and provided an abundance of easy prey. Cuckoos are some of the only birds able to digest Spongy Moth caterpillars and they can eat more than 100 of them at a time, so many in fact, that the caterpillar hairs become matted into a digestive felt inside the cuckoo’s stomach inhibiting its ability to absorb nutrients. Cuckoos are among the few birds in North America able to feed heavily on hairy caterpillars and have evolved the ability to regurgitate their entire stomach lining and grow a fresh one anew. Although the cuckoos barely put a dent in the spongy moth populations, the spongy moths are a boon for the cuckoos which gain the extra nutrition to lay multiple clutches of eggs.

Cuckoos can be incredibly difficult to see when perched. They are masters at remaining perfectly still and they keep their wings tucked tight when foraging. Mike Birmingham captured this wonderful image of a Yellow-billed Cuckoo on an exposed perch.

The edge between the unmoved pastures and adjacent woodlot hosted several species of forest and edge-adapted species including American Crow, American Goldfinch, Common Yellowthroat, Eastern Wood Pewee, Gray Catbird, Great-crested Flycatcher, Pileated Woodpecker, Red-bellied Woodpecker, Red-eyed Vireo, Rose-breasted Grosbeak, Song Sparrow, Warbling Vireo, White-breasted Nuthatch, and Wood Thrush

This stunning image of a local Wood Thrush was captured by Chris Franks. Wood Thrushes require at least some undisturbed woodland. Although they have survived forest fragmentation better than other woodland thrushes, their numbers have still declined by half in the last fifty years in New York State.

One hotspot of bird activity at Blue Star is the farm pond that lies to the north of their vegetable plots. Many farms in our region build fewer ponds these days as soil and water district grants have dried up, the importance of ponds for watering livestock has declined with the overall decline in animal agriculture, and many vegetable operations now opt for wells and drip irrigation. Homeowners still build ponds for aesthetic reasons, but new pond construction on farms is now rare. Nevertheless, a multitude of legacy ponds dot the Hudson Valley and can serve as oases for birds.

Blue Star’s pond hosted two territories of Song Sparrow, a pair of Red-winged Blackbirds, Barn Swallows, and several Yellow Warblers that caught some unidentified beetles at the waters edge to feed their young in adjacent willows. A small clan of Killdeer, black-and-white inland shorebirds, foraged along the pond’s muddy edge. While the nearby Hudson River is ancient, natural ponds are recent landscape features and quite rare because the fate of most ponds are to fill in quickly over time. The intentional disturbance created by pond construction in the last two centuries has provided a wealth of habitat value for our area. Are there ponds on your farm or property? If so, how long has it been there and what sorts of organisms does it host?

Not all disturbances are net negative events for wildlife. The sad looking oaks defoliated by Spongy Moths throughout the Hudson Valley this June have generated the highest populations of cuckoos I’ve ever seen and the oaks will surely rebound. The soil disturbances associated with Blue Star’s vegetable production created a flush of annual weed seeds now enjoyed by sparrows and their farm pond has produced the insects feeding a variety of native song birds. How to we measure ‘creative destruction’ and gauge how some disturbance is valuable or harmful? What values do we bring to that question and how does it affect the management decisions we make?

The Birds of Little Seed

The diversity of habitats in such a compact area, including a stream and riparian zone, upland pasture, hedgerows, weedy field margins, and vegetated crop zones permit many species of birds to coexist with the farming practices of Little Seed.

On a bright sunny morning on 17 June I was able to document breeding evidence for the following species at Little Seed

  • American Redstart (Feeding Young)
  • Bank Swallow (Used Nest)
  • Belted Kingfisher (Used Nest)
  • Chestnut-sided Warbler (Fledgling)
  • Common Grackle (Fledgling)
  • Common Yellowthroat (Singing territorially)
  • Eastern Kingbird (Feeding Young)
  • Field Sparrow (Fledgling)
  • Gray Catbird (Carrying Food for Young)
  • Indigo Bunting (Singing territorially)
  • Killdeer (Fledgling)
  • Northern Rough-winged Swallow (Fledgling)
  • Red-eyed Vireo (Carrying Food for Young)
  • Red-winged Blackbird (Fledgling)
  • Savannah Sparrow (Singing territorially)
  • Spotted Sandpiper (Singing territorially)
  • Song Sparrow (Fledgling and Nest with Eggs)
  • Warbling Vireo (Singing territorially).
  • Wood Duck (Fledgling)

As Conrad and Cladia described in their post, one of the most ecologically interesting and unique features of this farm is the stream and riparian edge that runs adjacent to the farm’s pastures. In addition to looking like a well-used and marvelous swimming hole, the stream and shorelines hosted a variety of interesting birds.

The pebble beach and distant exposed stream banks hosted several range-restricted riparian species of birds

The silt embankment of the stream provided nesting sites for three species of birds that take advantage of this specialized habitat. Bank Swallows, aptly named for their tendency to dig into the soft silt/sand edges of watercourses to form communal nesting cavities were present. Northern Rough-winged Swallows (that often nest as single pairs rather than in groups) also called this section of the stream home.

The red arrow points to one of the excavated cavities of a Bank Swallow nest. Bank Swallows were present flying over the creek, but this particular nest is likely abandoned, perhaps picked up by another cavity nester such as the Northern Rough-Winged Swallow. Bank Swallow colonies are inherently ephemeral, taking advantage of recently exposed banks due to flooding or erosion. Bank Swallows have been documented nesting in human-altered gravel banks and sand mines when natural habitat is unavailable.

This Bank Swallow was photographed by Mike Birmingham in the Hudson Valley. Like all swallows, its long wings allow it the great aerial performance necessary to chase and catch flying insects. Bank Swallows arrive to the Hudson Valley in May and depart to Central America in late August and September when flying insect biomass begins to decreases here locally.

The larger cavity to the left was recently used by a Belted Kingfisher, a much larger fish-eating crested bird that also nests in exposed embankments. This nest looks like it was also used in a previous season. Fresh nests show two clean groves where the adult kingfisher drags its feet as it enters and exits. A variety of mammals will renovate and inhabit this kind of valuable real estate when the breeding season ends.

An adult Wood Duck, another cavity nester, swam past on the creek with seven recently fledged ducklings in tow. Ducklings are a classic example of precocial young, meaning that shortly after they hatch they are mobile and able to explore and feed. Contrast these young swimmers with the pink, blind and helpless young of an American Robin (which are altricial young) that must be fed and kept warm to survive. Wood Ducks nest in cavities, but as their name implies, inside the cavities of trees rather than soil embankments. Sometimes suitable nesting holes can be so scarce that multiple females will lay in the same cavity creating super clutches of forty or more young. As soon as the birds are hatched and mobile they exit the cavity (sometimes falling 20 or 30 feet to the ground). Wood Duck chicks have a layer of fat that cushions the fall as they don’t always drop into the water from their nesting trees!

A drake (male) Wood Duck photographed by Mike Birmingham. Wood Ducks are examples of short-distant migrants. They typically leave the Hudson Valley in December but don’t go too far, finding open water in the Mid-Atlantic States. They return earlier than most migrants as well, typically showing up in the Hudson Valley in March. More than 100 years of data have shown us that as the climate warms, Wood Ducks linger here longer in the fall and arrive earlier in spring, often returning in February now, 2-3 weeks earlier than average.

In the pasture adjacent to the stream, three species of early breeding birds are already wrapping up the year’s nesting cycle. Red-winged Blackbirds fly in mixed age flocks in the pasture. They alight and drop back down into the grasses like rain. Common Grackles and their recently fledged soft gray young join them. These small flocks begin as the association of a few dozen breeding pairs. As the summer draws to a close these local flocks aggregate, joining others of their own species and and perhaps too by European Starlings and Brown-headed Cowbirds, sometimes reaching numbers in the tens of thousands. Birds of a Feather Flock Together, so the proverb goes, but in this literal sense the ecological needs of these bird change. In the summer, males aggressively defend individual territories. The proud red flash of a Red-winged Blackbird is designed in part to keep others away from their nesting territories. As breeding season ends, however, and their sexual hormones diminish, the value of so many neighbors becomes an essential survival tool. Many eyes can quickly spot predators and the dodge and weave of a large flock of blackbirds confuses their assailants. There is safety in numbers.

Some of the more experienced Red-Wing Blackbirds will raise a second clutch, but the bulk of breeding is already over just as the summer solstice arrives. Other species of birds, like the pair of American Goldfinch that fly over the pasture, are just forming their pair bonds and attracting mates, not yet ready to lay eggs. They will gather together nests of spider webs and milkweed silk embroidered with lichens as the first apples of the Hudson Valley are picked. Each species of bird has its own season and rhythm.

Tree Swallows, a third early breeder also flies over the stream near the pasture. These iridescent blue-green, white-bellied swallows nest in tree cavities just like Wood Ducks. Placing a bluebird box next to a water course is almost certain to attract them. They are the first swallows to arrive to the Hudson Valley each year, typically in March, and the last to leave. Unusual for migrants, they have a long season locally after their breeding cycle. In early July they perch crowded on local power lines and those flocks always remind me of the pivotal moment when summer has peaked and we begin the long slow walk to winter. They seem to be able to eke out a living when other species of swallows have long departed and it’s not impossible to see them in our area as late as October.

On many conventional farms, active cropping areas typically have low bird diversity, but the unmanaged edges at Little Seed provide habitat for birds even in places that are heavily travelled and used for production.

The seeding grasses in and around these plastic tunnel greenhouses provide enough habitat for sparrows to nest and feed.

Song Sparrows are particularly good at finding small breeding niches in weedy field margins and hedgerows when given the chance. They are true omnivores feeding on a variety of insect prey, seeds, and fruits.

As their name implies, Song Sparrows have complex — and to our ears, pleasant — songs that they sing over and over to define and defend their territories.

Even the seasonal weeds that grow up around equipment storage sties can be an oasis for sparrows and other birds

Fenceposts can be important feeding sites for birds. An Eastern Bluebird (that just dived out of view of my camera!) used this post to ambush and pounce down onto insects below.

Brush piles can be essential cover for sparrows and other birds, particularly in the winter when the lack of leaves makes many small birds easy targets for aerial predators.

As an ecologically minded farmer, I often ask myself the question: Is it better to provide wildlife habitat on my farm by encouraging more undisturbed and fallow land, or should I work harder to integrate spaces for wildlife in and among my cropping areas? Little Seed clearly demonstrated both solutions. And although, I’m not sure there is ever a firm answer to this question, or if I have even framed it correctly, I left the farm thinking more and more about these two approaches.

Birds of the prairie at the Churchtown Dairy

A recently grazed paddock at Churchtown with a ‘messy’ field edge hugging hedgerows and electric fencing

By Will

I live a short walk from the Churchtown Dairy and my family’s 109-year old fruit and vegetable farm is only a few miles to the south so I have come to know this area well. The old Churchtown General Store to the left of the introductory photo was one of the last places in Columbia County to sell bushel baskets of penny candy (without novelty or irony) and I recall biking past these fields on my ten-speed nearly forty years ago to get a regular and affordable sugar rush. The store is long gone now. In the 1960s, against the advice of all of our farming neighbors not to buy such steep and “useless” land, my mother purchased the top of a drumlin just across the road from the dairy where my father planted an unsuccessful Christmas tree farm. That hill, now a riot of eastern red cedar and red maple is taking its time growing back into a oak-hickory forest.

I can’t remember a time when grass did not dominate this road. When I was young, The Weaver family (also still farming in the area today after more than a century) managed many of the hayfields to the South and when I was a teenager it was the first place I saw and heard many of the grassland species of birds that I now study as an adult. Grassland birds are particularly good at site fidelity, meaning that birds that successfully raise chicks at a location return to that same location again and again, year after year. And so have I, it seems, returned after careers abroad, flying back to my nesting grounds at my family farm to rear my own young. It is with these layers of context and familiarity that I was pleased to accept the chance to visit this property with fresh eyes.

Before I begin, I’d like to thank the members of the Alan Devoe Bird Club for providing photos of local birds for this blog. Although they are not the exact individuals I found and describe in my posts, they are representative examples found here in the Hudson Valley. Special thanks go to Mike Birmingham, Chris Franks, Mayuko Fujino, and Marian Sole for laboring in the field with heavy telephoto lenses to capture great images of birds so I didn’t have to! Future blog posts will have live links to the Alan Devoe Bird Club (and other bird groups in the Hudson Valley) should readers wish to connect and learn more.

We can only guess at how many grasslands and fields existed in the Hudson Valley before European settlement. Some clues come from old surveying records, pollen samples from undisturbed accumulated layers of mud, and the guesses of anthropologists familiar with the farming practices of the First Peoples who lived here for millennia. What is clear from the historic record is that grassland birds took off quickly after European settlers cut the eastern forest into pastures and hayfields that mimicked the tall-grass prairies that these birds evolved in. Today, as much of the the Midwest grows corn instead of grass, these leftover eastern hayfields and pastures act as areas of last refuge among regrowing forests and human development. Grassland birds that shifted their breeding locations east today continue to breed here like fish in shrinking pools. Their fate is uncertain. All of New York’s grassland species of birds are in decline, some precipitously. Many are in decline on their ancestral lands too making them a natural subject of conservation.

Why are they declining? There are lots of reasons, but habitat destruction and intensive uses of remaining grasslands top the list. A century ago, farming was inefficient. The horse-drawn world could not mow a field from hedgerow to road in a few minutes. Moreover, among the busy calendar of chores, mowing didn’t start until late June and July and birds had a chance to nest and fledge before the cutting started. Today, hay is cut earlier to maximize its nutritional value, rotational grazing of livestock is intense and even non-farmers prefer to mow their lands to look like estates and golf courses. In many grasslands, there simply isn’t enough time between disturbances for most birds to mate, build nests, and rear young. That these birds manage to persist at all is a kind of miracle of determination. Colleagues of mine at the Hudson Valley Farm Hub in Hurley routinely record nest failures even when conditions are prime.

Savannah Sparrows fare better than most other grassland birds due to their ability to nest in the margins of fields, farm lanes, and active crops. As climate change warms our winters we find many more of them in the Hudson Valley year round. Photo: Mike Birmingham

What interests me most at Churchtown is that there are grassland birds — many of them, in fact, and they exist on a working farm where bird habitat management is an ancillary goal. Millions more grassland birds existed in New York a century ago when virtually zero farms managed for their success at all. Why do some farms host birds and others do not?

I think cows are one of the primary reasons that Bobolinks, Eastern Meadowlarks, Savannah Sparrows, and Grasshopper Sparrows can all be found at Churchtown. Cows can trample nests and remove grass but not as fast as a rotary mower. Both Savannah and Grasshopper Sparrows have seemed to find a niche in these pastures, building nests in the shaggy field edges under single-strand electric fences that cows are shy to graze closely for fear of electric shock.

These messy edges that are lightly grazed provide just enough habitat for grassland sparrows to eke out a nest or two.

It was exciting to note breeding evidence for at least two pairs of Grasshopper Sparrows. These birds are easily overlooked, even by experienced birders, because they are small and drab and their song is very unbirdlike–a quiet lisping insect buzz. Even in their core breeding range in the Midwest, this species has declined 72 percent since 1966, according to the North American Breeding Bird Survey. I have only documented a handful of nesting records for this species in all of Columbia County so its presence here is special. They need largely undisturbed mature hayfields and pastures during late May and early June in order to rear young. I have never seen this species using the unique habitat of electric fence ‘edge.’ The birds I found were carrying food for young, which fledge in 6-9 days after hatching. It’s a race against time. When nests are destroyed, they often try a second, even a third time. More study is needed to accurately track their success at Churchtown.

So many drab or overlooked species show subtle beauty such as the dab of warm Naples yellow above the eye or lemon wash on the forewing of this Grasshopper Sparrow. Photo: Chris Franks.

On that point, it’s unclear to me if the bobolinks and eastern meadowlarks found at Churchtown are successful nesters or displaced birds from nest disturbances. Unlike the sparrows, both of these birds avoid edges and need larger areas of grass. Bobolinks are less picky about the vegetation type they nest in, but meadowlarks need long grasses to weave an intricate nest that looks more like a hutch than a cup — not easy to do in alfalfa or clover. They need true grass. They also breed early, preferring to nest in May just as many hayfields are getting their first cutting. Many are the fields that attract meadowlarks in the Hudson Valley only to encourage nests that are destroyed shortly after by mowers. The landscape at Churchtown is attracting meadowlarks but are they rearing young successfully?

As we reached out to each of the participating farms in this study we asked the question: What would you like us to pay attention to? In addition to a report on grassland birds, Churchtown specifically asked about the value of its unique hedgerows for birds.

This lane-and-hedge aesthetic is common in England and Europe and fairly uncommon in North America. Would native birds use it for food and shelter?

We have a long tradition in America of borrowing European, specifically English aesthetics, and surrounding the Churchtown Dairy are extensive lanes bordered by hedges. Some European immigrants planted hedges specifically as “living fences” for livestock, but most hedges in eastern North America are the product of neglect rather than design. As shrubs overtook “rail over rock” fences and stone walls, they too became living fences, particularly as livestock abandoned a field and mowers did not trim field edges . The hedges at Churchtown are dominated by a non-native species of hazel and are poker straight — I wondered if these ‘English’ hedges would attract birds any better than a suburban landscape?

To my surprise, the answer is largely yes.

Two Brown Thrashers, declining shrubland species in New York, foraged for caterpillars in the hedges, possibly a breeding pair.

Brown Thrashes are related to mockingbirds and mimic the sounds of other birds, cats, even beeping cars, singing in April and May in distinct couplets. I’ve noticed that this species seems to be developing a tolerance for human landscapes as other shrublands grow into mature forests or are lost to development. They are particularly fond of transmission line corridors that are not mowed annually allowing for analog shrub habitats. Notice the striking yellow eye and warm chestnut back. Photo: Mike Birmingham.

The hedges also hosted the following species of birds

  • Mourning Dove
  • Cedar Waxwing
  • Northern Mockinbird
  • House Wren
  • Eurasian Starling
  • American Robin
  • Song Sparrow
  • Field Sparrow
  • Chipping Sparrow
  • Yellow Warbler
  • Red-winged Blackbird
  • American Goldfinch

Another surprise in the hedges were three Willow Flycatchers. As the name implies, these birds perch on snags and twigs, sallying forth to capture flying insects with a keen vision that has evolved to detect rapid movement. They are not uncommon in the Hudson Valley, but I rarely see them in dry agricultural landscapes, and almost never in nonnative landscape plantings. They prefer wet pond margins or slow stream beds overgrown with willow and alder. Their song isn’t much of a song at all — a sneezy FITZbew! They are a member of the Empidonax tribe of flycatchers, all drab yellow-green small birds that reach their highest diversity in South America.

Willow flycatchers nest in woven cups in dense shrubs. They are expert renovators and if a nest fails they have been observed taking the building materials of the failed nest and carrying it to a new place to rebuild. Photo: Mike Birmingham.

It’s tempting to think of the ecological past as unchanging, but dynamism has always been a part of ecology as plants and animals have always moved, evolved, flourished, died, and changed. Studying birds provides such an interesting perspective because significant regional and continental changes can sometimes occur within the span of a human lifetime (in this case, the span of the life of a middle-aged farmer). Churchtown has changed since I was a kid, and it’s interesting to see how some of the birds are changing with it. Bird communities have an astounding and, dare I say, hopeful ability to rebound when given the essential ingredients they need to raise young and survive to breeding condition.

Are there new birds that you’ve noticed on your property or in a favorite landscape? Have others disappeared? I’ll revisit a few of these grassland species (and other farm species) in future posts.

Beetles by the Creek: A Snapshot from the Hudson Valley Seed Company.

The rocky shore of the North Peters Kill, prime habitat for certain ground beetles.

by Conrad.

Sorry, but the field season, got in the way of our best intentions of keeping this blog ‘live’. We have now made most of our farm visits and over the next couple of months plan to post the reports of those visits here, albeit two-three months behind the times! As a little teaser, this is a short profile of some of the beetles we found by the North Peters Kill, which runs along the southwest edge of Hudson Valley Seed Company’s Airport Rd property in Accord, NY. We made this visit on 6 Sept. 2024.

As some of you may know, ground beetles and I go back a long way together. I first got interested in ground beetles when we were doing a floodplain forest study many years ago – such forests and the associated stream banks tend to have a diversity of ground beetles, and so they can be used to assess forest ‘condition’. Later, as we started doing more agroecology work, the ground beetle interest turned to the question ‘how can these purported beneficials be encouraged on farms?’. We currently have various projects related to that question at the Hudson Valley Farm Hub.

However, as they say, it’s nice to get back to ones roots…

While snooping along the rock margins of the North Peters Kill, I came across an appealing cross-section of stream-bank ground beetles. With a few exceptions, stream-bank ground beetles rarely venture into agricultural fields, so I won’t claim that the beetles profiled here are somehow integral to sustainable agriculture; I just want to make the case that, in their own little ways, they’re exquisite.

First, before talking beetles, imagine this stream-edge habitat. Rocks sit waist deep in water, ‘fertilized’ by whatever periodically washes downstream or grows in this moist, often sunny, environment. This is prime habitat for scavengers who feed directly on the flotsam and rock fuzz (that’s NOT a scientific term!) and for predators feeding on those scavengers. Largely but not completely missing are those banner scavengers, the ants.

Among the other invertebrates who seem to appreciate these haunts are spiders.
Here, a wolf spider mother carries her egg sac across wet rocks. Once they hatch, the young spiders will ride their mother’s back for a while before striking out on their own. Who said only vertebrates exhibit maternal care?
This appears to be a firefly grub; these forage for soft-bodied invertz.

The stereotypical ground beetle is an elongate, black oval with relatively long legs and a propensity to scurry. And some creekside ground beetles do fit the mold. Agonum is a genus of ground beetles which includes, but is not limited to, a range of medium-sized, relatively nondescript (until you get out the microscope) beetles of wetter areas.

This probable Agonum was about 1/4″ long. This species seemed to be the most common ground beetle of these rocks – quickly running off when I lifted stones. This may be an omnivore, scavenging on vegetable matter and preying on smaller creatures.

But more exotic beetles may lurk beneath the rocks….

True, no ground beetles in this picture, but that brown stain on my thumb is a chemical burn left by the defensive actions of a Bombardier Beetle.

Bombardier Beetles, like many other ‘noxious’ (at least to their would-be predators) insects are conspicuous. Their colors say, “Eat me and you’ll regret it.”. Inside their bodies are two chemicals which, when mixed together, become a very caustic substance. When irritated, the beetles combine these two chemicals and squirt the new compound out the directional nozzle on their rear ends. (For videos of this in action, go to 3 mins into this BBC clip.) The burn on my thumb came when I picked up a Bombardier Beetle. There was a faint “Ffffft” and a base-ball sized cloud of vapor which left this ‘wound’ on my thumb. I didn’t feel anything but I wouldn’t want to be a bird who got that in the eye or a small insect who was bathed in it.

These beetles are reported to be mainly carnivorous. Could they also use their scalding hose to hunt?

These Bombardier Beetles were mainly found amongst the drier rocks above water level. Their bright coloration makes them hard to miss and easy to remember, in the same way that Monarch butterflies don’t try to be inconspicuous.

Another showy ground beetle of the North Peters Kill banks is, to use its scientific name, Chlaenius sericeus. This is a large, startlingly green beetle covered in a fine fuzz. It is reportedly another predator on the prowl. While these beetles don’t possess the Bombardier’s chemical canon, they are not short on odor – for most of the rest of the afternoon after picking one of these up while taking these photographs, my fingers smelt of rancid butter. This is a hairy genus of ground beetle, literally. Most ground beetles are relatively smooth-surfaced. A few upland species are fuzzy, and this tends to accumulate the dust of their surroundings, seemingly providing effective camouflage. But these are wetland creatures, not apt to get dust covered, so what might be the utility of the pelage?

To suggest an answer to that, I need to talk about photography. I sometimes take the ‘desert island’ approach to photographing live ground beetles. Ground beetles are fast. Often, if you just put one down on the ground, it’s gone before you can snap a picture. So, I put them on a rock surrounded by water and, while they try to figure out their predicament, I take some photos before usually releasing them somewhere back on dry land. For many ground beetles that approach works but, as it turns out, not for Chlaenius. Those beetles either crawl down the side of the rock and voluntarily fully submerge themselves or they take off in a skating/swimming motion across the water. In either case, those hairs could help. By trapping air, they could make the ground beetle more buoyant, facilitating swimming. Alternatively, if they can pull themselves underwater, that trapped air could serve as a diving bell of sorts, providing them with an air reserve.

This is a cool beetle who really deserves a good common name, any suggestions?

This Chlaenius sericeus was found along the same, rocky North Peters Kill beach. These are large (ca. 1/2″), beautifully colored ground beetles.
When confined to its ‘desert island’, this same beetle scuttered away across the water, perhaps aided by air trapped on its fuzzy body (it’s underside is also fuzzy).
This is an earlier photo of a related species taken elsewhere. On at least a couple of instances, I have seen rock-bound Chlaenius such as this one purposefully clamber over the edge and down into the water. This photo shows the silvery air bubble trapped in the beetle’s fuzz.

To add to this exotic fauna, we have the pill-shaped Omophron americanus. A ground beetle so oddly shaped that it is hard to believe it’s even a ground beetle. These are beetles of gravelly or sandy stream banks. It has been suggested that their round shape helps them quickly bury themselves in loose sand. One often finds them by pouring water on such beaches and then waiting to see who pops out of the ground for air (it is an understandable general behaviour of stream-side ground beetles that when water arrives, they head for higher ground). As their impressive mandibles suggest, they are predatory.

This North Peters Kill Omophron kindly waited around for photographs.

Most of the above-mentioned ground beetles are found primarily along waterways or around water bodies. Only rarely do we find them in farm fields. But Patrobus longicornis is an exception. This polished, black ground beetle is supported by spindly, light-colored legs that make it a spritely runner. I didn’t actually find this species in my short visit to the North Peters Kill, but have seen it along many other regional creeks. However, we also regularly find it in and around farm fields. It’s an omnivore and could, conceivably, be consuming weed seeds. One of our current projects is exploring the diets of on-farm ground beetles to see if we can better describe their potential agronomic role.

However, to end back at the beginning, it’s sometimes nice to forget about utility and just spend some time appreciating the ‘exotic’ in our own backyards.

A Patrobus longicornis photographed elsewhere. This is a relatively common beetle of both stream banks and farm fields.

12 July 2024: Insects of Rose Hill

by Conrad (with some photos and field assistance from Laura & Meg).

First of all, I’m not trying to ‘back date my check’ by associating this with a date of 9 days ago – that is when we visited Rose Hill, not the date on which this was written. Because phenology changes rapidly, it seems important to use the date we were actually on the ground.

In 1936, on the current land of Rose Hill Farm only the northwest corner appeared to be in orchard.

Today, orchards of various sorts fill much of Rose Hill. Surprisingly, one of the areas reverting to forest is that northwest area which appeared to be orchard in the earlier image. The pink line refers to our approximate path, and yellow-boxed numbers indicated the approximate locations of some of the below landscape shots.

Several ponds are scattered across Rose Hill. This photograph was taken looking southwest from roughly point 1 on the above map. All ponds probably had predatory fish, possibly reducing their ecological value for some dragonflies.

One of the ecologically most interesting areas was the wet meadow shown in this photo, taken looking west-northwest along the fence from near point 2. There is wetland beyond the fence here and that wetland has snuck into Rose Hill.

Among the fun plants spotted in this area were Yellow Star Grass (a somewhat unusual plant found in both wetlands and dry forests) and…

Square-stemmed Monkey Flower, a moist-meadow plant.

Some of the strips between trees had been left unmowed, leaving a welcome abundance of clover. This picture was taken near point 2, looking north.

Mowing had occurred between the rows of some smaller trees, although taller vegetation, including Common Milkweed and Indian Hemp, was growing up within rows but between the trees. This photo was taken looking northeast from around point 3.

There were also larger patches of uncut vegetation, including this dry hillock north of point 4 and capped by sumach and knapweed.

This moister, unmowed block was located roughly north of point 5. Flowers included Queen Anne’s Lace (aka Wild Carrot) and Common Milkweed. The Rose Hill bioblock, where they are experimenting with organic production, is located just beyond this meadow, but we did not enter because it had recently been sprayed with organic pesticides.

This photo was taken looking north from point 6; a pond is hidden behind the bushes and surrounded by this wetter meadow.

We split up and circled around these ponds before rejoining for a quick lunch near the main parking lot and heading out for a final loop through the northwest section of the Farm.

We’ll begin our ‘insect hodge-podge’ section with this species, the elegant, iridescent Dogbane Beetle, which we found hanging out in the Indian Hemp (a species of Dogbane).

Lacewings are described as beneficials, largely because of their predatory larvae. One can even buy them commercially. However, we see their adults and larvae so rarely that it’s hard to believe that, in our region at least, they are usually having much of a demographic impact on pests. If you have observed otherwise, please let us know!

Crops aren’t the only plants afflicted by aphids – here Common Milkweed flowers appear to sag under their aphid load.

Honey Bees were the most common bee we observed (not surprising, given the on-farm bee hives), however we did observe some other bees including this Brown-belted Bumble Bee (Bombus griseocollis) and this…

This is a Giant (or “Sculptured”) Resin Bee. I was rather baffled by this bee, and do not recall having seen it before. This is an Asian bee that was apparently accidentally introduced to the US in the early 1990s; it now occurs throughout most of the East Coast. It is solitary and makes its solo nests in wood cavities. It apparently doesn’t make its own excavations, and so sometimes uses the holes pre-drilled by our native carpenter bees.

Dragonfly and damselfly diversity was not particularly high, perhaps because of the presence of fish. Among the species we noted were the following:

The common, widespread Widow Skimmer; this mature male shows the characteristic black wing bases fringed with white frosting.

This bright green beast is a female Eastern Pondhawk; she’s really our only dragonfly with such a vibrant green coloration.

The maturing blue male of the Eastern Pondhawk, both sexes have that white tail tip.

Sorry for the ‘headless’ photograph, but at least this image shows the distinctive orange wings of the male Eastern Amberwing.

It appears that this female Eastern Amberwing may have flown too close to the clay sprayer. In organic orcharding, a clay compound is used to coat fruit with a protective clay layer.

The colorful Halloween Pennant is common in our fields at this time of year.

For longer than I should have, I mistook this for the preceding species because of its similar size, behaviour,and orange-yellow coloration. However, note the different patterning of the dark dots on the wings. This is a Calico Pennant, whose females and young males look like this. Mature males are…

a distinct red (but don’t mistake them for Meadowhawks!).

Damselflies, such as this bluet, tend to be smaller and thinner.

One of the key characteristics for identifying these insects is the shape of the so-called claspers – the structures that the males use to grasp the females behind the head. Because that physical pairing is a integral part of the mate bonding, clasper structure tends to be unique, perhaps creating something like a lock-and-key with the architecture of the female. The shape of these claspers (together with features of its coloration) suggest that this is a Familiar Bluet. As the name suggests, this is a common species; it found throughout almost the entire continental US.

The purplish hue of this damselfly earmark it as a Variable Dancer. This another relatively common species, with the core of its distribution in the eastern US.

Turning to the butterflies, we were welcomed to the parking lot by a Giant Swallowtail. As the name implies, this is our largest swallowtail species. Unique among our species, it appears to be yellow with black markings below and black with yellow markings above. This is a southern species that occasionally comes north in greater or lesser numbers. This years seems to be a relatively good one for it, as we have noted it at various locations. Its only regional caterpillar foodplant (outside of some garden exotics) is probably Northern Prickly Ash, a sparsely distributed species in our region.

A Viceroy hanging out on Indian Hemp, as documented below…

its look-alike, the Monarch, was also present. It was once thought that the palatable Viceroy mimicked the distasteful Monarch. It is now believed that both are distasteful and so reinforce each other’s warning coloration. Here, a Monarch visits milkweed in the wet meadow of the southwest corner. Also present in this photo is..

what appears to be a Great Spangled Fritillary. Last year was a banner year for this species, they seem noticeably less abundant this year. Because their caterpillars eat violets, they tend to be associated with forest edges. Although we didn’t get a good photograph of it, we also saw one individual of the Great Spangled’s smaller cousin, the Meadow Fritillary.

This sharply marked little skipper was found relatively near that same wet meadow. This is a Mulberry Wing (so named because some fresh individuals have a distinctly purplish hue). Its caterpillars feed on sedges and we generally associate it with well-developed, older wetlands, and we consider it somewhat unusual.

Dun Skippers were more common. This individual has an atypical white wing marking on one side, perhaps associated with some developmental quirk or a post-metamorphosis run-in. Its caterpillars are also sedge feeders, but it doesn’t seem to be a tightly associated with wetlands.

To finish with the skippers, this large species was relatively common both here and at other farms – which butterfly is it?

At first glance, one might think that both of these are Black Swallowtails, but actually only the top photograph is that species. The bottom is a Spicebush Swallowtail (so identified by the one missing orange spot along the inner row of orange spots on the underside of the hind wing); as the name implies, its caterpillars feed on Spicebush, a shrub of wet areas.

Common Ringlet, a butterfly that should already be familiar if you have read previous blogs; it is regularly found bouncing across old fields at this time of year.

Two more welcome ‘regulars’ during this time of year, a Common Woodnymph (lower left) and Pearl Crescent (upper right).

Eastern Tailed-blues tend to be most common (or at least visible!) in short, grassy areas. Sooty grey means this is a female.

This beauty is a good butterfly shot to end with – our only truly green regional butterfly, the Juniper Hairstreak, is widespread but sparsely distributed in our area. Its caterpillars feed on Red Cedar (actually a juniper), and it is usually found near stands of that tree. Its presence at Rose Hill surprised us because we hadn’t come across many Red Cedar on the farm. However, Kevin assured us they are nearby. Some orchardists aren’t fond of Red Cedar, because it is the alternate host of Apple-Cedar Rust.

As listed above, we saw about 21 butterfly species at Rose Hill, the core group of widespread openland butterflies was spiced by a few species associated with damper areas (indicated in blue hues above). While some of these (fainter blue) seem to range more widely, Mulberry Wing and Spicebush Swallowtail (brighter blue) have tighter wetland associations. Also augmenting the diversity were a couple of species that, while not rare, we only see occasionally: Juniper Hairstreak and Giant Swallowtail. The ample flowers left along edges, around ponds, and in ‘roughs’ retained within the orchards helped attract and support this diversity.

As noted, the dragonfly community was primarily composed of relatively common (nothing wrong with that!) pond dragonflies and damselflies.

Three Familiar Bluets have a tête-à-tête.

15 July 2024: Blue Star Farm’s Wild-growing Plants

Blue Star Farm produces a variety of vegetables and the core of the farm is composed of a mosaic of intensively-managed beds, cover crops, fallow fields, and mowed drive strips. Towards the surrounding tree lines and forest patches, there are also less frequently-mowed meadow areas and narrow bands of “soft edges”, where low woody plants provide a transition from field to forest. For my exploration of the wild-growing plants on the farm, I spent around four hours on July 11, 2024 mostly in the less-intensively managed areas of the farm. This included brief visits to two adjacent patches of swamp forest, one ancient (probably not cleared for agriculture for centuries, if ever, and visible as a triangle in the historical aerial photo from the 1940s in Conrad’s blog from yesterday) and the other, just east of the current fields, recently reforested from a formerly cleared area. I also spent some time recording the plants in and around the recently dug irrigation pond. The inventory resulted in a list of 200 plant species, half of which considered native to this region. In this blog, I’ll try to provide a glimpse of the wild-growing plant life on the farm.

This first picture gives an impression of Blue Star Farm looking south from the approximate center of the fields, with the edge of the young swamp forest on the east side in the background.

A fallow field (it produced kale last year, but had not been worked this season) along the western edge features some of the most common wild-growing plants in the actively-farmed area: Daisy Fleabane (Erigeron annuus; sea of white flowers) and Horseweed (Erigeron canadensis; slender, tall plants, not yet in bloom). Both species are native to Northeastern North America and can become quite common in 1st year fallows of formerly tilled fields. Their shallow flowers provide nectar to small insects, including parasitoid wasps. The picture also shows a single individual of Pokeweed (Phytolacca americana).

Another fallow field along the eastern edge supports a similar plant community.

A closer look at the daisy-like flower heads of Daisy Fleabane. This species can be seen in bloom from May to October and has smaller flower heads than Oxeye Daisy (Leucanthemum vulgare), which also blooms in early summer. It has more white ray flowers (arranged like petals around the yellow disk flowers) than the many similar-looking aster species, which will open their flowers in August/September.

Another common wild-growing plant in 1st year fallow fields was the yellow-flowering Tall Hedge-mustard (Sisymbrium loeselii). It is a European plant that has been spreading relatively recently and rapidly across North America and is not included in my favorite field guide. Therefore, I suspect that I might have been mis-identifying it for a few years as one of the more established, and better-known species in the same genus.

This former strawberry field has a good representation of the most common weeds at Blue Star Farm, including Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti), which is easily recognized by its large, heart-shaped (and velvety) leaves. Reportedly, it has been intentionally introduced to America as a source of fiber. In Asia, where this species originated, it is also used for medicinal and veterinary purposes. In a quick internet search, I could not find any reference about what an abundance of this plant might tell us about the soil conditions (this was a question Sue brought up during our visit–sorry, no new insights).

Here and there in the fallow fields and unmowed areas of the farm, one finds examples of (I think) two very similar-looking vetch species: Cow, Bird, or Tufted Vetch (Vicia cracca; left) and Hairy or Winter Vetch (V. villosa) on the right. Tufted Vetch has a larger upper petal (“flag”) and upper calyx lobes that are broadly triangular, while Hairy Vetch has a shorter flag and upper calyx lobes that are narrowly triangular. I might not be getting this right, yet, but both species are reportedly common on farms in our area. A third species, Slender Vetch (V. tetrasperma) is a very delicate plant with much smaller and fewer pink (instead of purple) flowers, and also grows at Blue Star Farm. All three are originally from Europe.

The reddish hue in the fallow field on the right is from Redtop (Agrostis gigantea), a European grass.

Two species of sumac grow along the western field edge: Smooth Sumac (Rhus glabra; left) and Staghorn Sumac (Rhus typhina; right). Note the difference in the surface texture of their shoots: that of Smooth Sumac is glaucous, with a waxy layer that can be rubbed off, while that of Staghorn Sumac is velvety hairy, like the growing antlers of a deer. Both images show female plants, which are producing berries. Their male counterparts had yellow flowers in the spring, which spread their pollen and are now wilted.

These two species are very different from Poison Sumac (Toxicodendron vernix), which is more closely related to Poison Ivy (T. radicans) and is a shrub with white berries that grows in wetlands. It is not usually found on farms or along roadsides.

The very invasive, non-native Tree-of-Heaven (Ailanthus altissimus) has leaves similar to those of the native Smooth and Staghorn Sumacs and—like them—forms clonal colonies with a joint root system.

However, the female Tree-of-Heaven plants produce wind-dispersed, propeller-shaped fruits that are very different from the red Sumac berries. If you haven’t tried it, the smell of their leaves is also a good way to distinguish the Sumacs and Tree-of-Heaven. To me, the crushed leaves of Sumacs have a pleasant, aromatic, resinous scent, while crushed Tree-of-Heaven leaves have a rank smell reminiscent of rancid peanut butter.

Now, let’s explore a bit the plant life in and around the newly dug irrigation pond. The tall plants right along the water’s edge are two species of native cattails. Although most of the water is clear, you can see some “greenery” floating on the surface around the shoreline.

This “pond scum” is most likely composed of filamentous green algae (not to be confused with the sometimes toxic cyanobacteria, which are often referred to as “blue-green algae”). Ecologically, the filamentous green algae are nothing to worry about if they occur in small amounts. They indicate that there are some nutrients in the water, which is not surprising, if a pond is dug in an area that has long been farmed.

In shallow water, just underneath the surface grows a native aquatic plant, aptly called Eutrophic Water Nymph (Najas minor), another indicator of nutrient-rich water.

In the shallow water along the shore, there were also some small plants of the invasive, non-native Curly Pondweed (Potamogeton crispus). As the pond matures, it remains to be seen how this species behaves… Some amount of aquatic plants is a very good thing to provide shelter and food for aquatic insects (including dragonfly larvae) and amphibians. Should the aquatic plants ever become too much, please consider mechanical removal (which has the added advantage that the nutrients stored in them get removed from the waterbody) and DO NOT introduce grass carp to control the vegetation! In our experience, these plant-eating fish turn ponds into a turbid soup without any plant life and little habitat value for aquatic insects and amphibians.

On the east side of the pond is a well-established meadow composed of at least 50 (probably many more) different grasses, sedges, wildflowers, as well as some shrubs and vines. This was one of the most flower-rich and botanically-diverse areas of the farm and is a perfect example of a “soft edge” to the neighboring forest.

Common Boneset (Eupatorium perfoliatum) is an example of a native wildflower only seen in this meadow during the botanical survey.

East of the pond is a narrow band of recently reforested swamp forest. We did not take the time for a complete tree inventory, but noted the presence of Pin Oak, Red Maple, Black Cherry, Black Locust, White Mulberry, and Trembling Aspen. This area also harbors some invasive shrubs and seems to be the epicenter of the invasive Japanese Stiltgrass (Microstegium vimineum; not pictured) on the Farm.

Nonetheless, there were also some native botanical treasures in this young swamp forest, such as the Spotted St. John’s-wort (Hypericum punctatum). This is one of three St. John’s-worts found at Blue Star Farm. The other two are the native Dwarf St. John’s-wort (H. mutilum), spotted on the shore of the irrigation pond, and the non-native Common St. John’s-wort (H. perforatum) which was seen here and there in the unmowed areas.

Ragged Robin (Lychnis flos-cuculi) is a European plant, related to chickweeds and carnations. It grew in the young swamp forest and was also found in the meadows east of it.

Finally, we reach the patch of ancient swamp forest further east (indicated by the triangular area of forest at the center of the historical aerial photo in Conrad’s post from 13 July). This forest is characterized by very few invasive species and by the presence of some unique tree species, seemingly not found anywhere else on the Farm. The patches without vegetation indicate seasonally flooded areas, which might serve as breeding grounds for vernal pool amphibians, if they hold water long enough in the spring to allow tadpoles of Spotted Salamanders and Wood Frogs to develop. However, the presence of these amphibians on the Farm was not confirmed during our brief survey!

Yellow Birch (Betula alleghaniensis) is easily recognized by its shiny, peeling bark and the often octopus-like, superficial roots. It is one of the two “sweet birches”, whose twigs smell of wintergreen (= root beer). In our experience, this species does not readily establish in post-agricultural forests and—at least in our area—is a good indicator of “ancient forest” (a forest that has not been cleared for agriculture during European colonization.)

At the center of this image, you see the uniquely-divided leaves of Royal Fern (Osmunda regalis), an uncommon native wetland fern. It is surrounded by Spotted Jewelweed (Impatiens capensis), which made up the bulk of the ground cover in this forest.

There are two species of native Jewelweeds at Blue Star Farm. Spotted Jewelweed (I. capensis) has orange, spotted flowers and usually no more than nine teeth along the margin of each side of its leaf. As we have seen, it grows abundantly in the ancient swamp forest. Its yellow-flowering cousin is Pale Jewelweed (I. pallida), which was found along the southern edge of the young swamp forest. Note how its leaf margins have more than nine teeth. Fortunately, the invasive, pink-flowering (and much taller!) Himalayan Jewelweed (I. glandulifera) is still quite rare in Columbia County and was not found at Blue Star Farm.

This, admittedly somewhat tattered, plant is Mad Dog Skullcap (Scutellaria lateriflora), a native member of the mint family, which reportedly is used in herbal medicine as a mild sedative and anti-anxiety treatment. In the 18th century, there was a belief that this plant could cure rabies (hence the name “Mad Dog”), but this has been disproven.

Another nice find in the ancient swamp forest was Ditch Stonecrop (Penthorum sedoides), a native wetland plant not seen anywhere else at Blue Star Farm.

Finally, this parting shot shows a Blackgum (Nyssa sylvatica) seedling, growing next to the luxuriant fronds of Interrupted Fern (Osmunda claytoniana). Blackgum is an uncommon tree in Columbia County, usually found in swamp forests and around vernal pools. Cinnamon Fern (Osmundastrum cinnamomeum) which looks similar to Interrupted Fern, but is not pictured here, was also abundant in the ancient swamp forest.

11 July 2024: Blue Star Farm & Surroundings.

by Conrad.

As this LiDAR image shows, the western portion of Blue Star Farm, run by Sue Decker, is located in Stuyvesant NY on terrace land above the Hudson River (seen on the left). A seasonal waterway drains north out of this farm, joining up with Mill Creek shortly before entering the Hudson. Sue’s “home farm” is slightly farther east along route 26A.

We parked just southwest of the “1” on the map and then headed north along veggie and cover crop beds, before cutting northeast to the new pond (near “2”) and then following the forest edge south, before cutting west through veggie plots to flower beds of Damsel Garden, run by land owner Denise Pizzini. We then moved south before turning east along the pastures, and finally bearing north into a finger of wettish meadow. The forested sections in the center of the land are wetland, sporting some interesting trees that Claudia will describe in a subsequent plant post.

In the 1940s, much of the now-forested area was cleared, although a patch of mature swamp forest existed near the center of the parcel. As was typical of this era, orchards were extensive, although they only nudged into the edges of the current farmland

This photograph looks north from near the point marked “1” on the earlier image.

This photograph was taken from near point “2” and looks south, across a pond constructed around 2022. This was a dragonfly hot bed, as we’ll see later.

This picture, taken looking south from a bit north of point “3”, shows the welcoming (at least to insects!) soft edge with the forest.

This photograph was taken around point “3” and looks southwest across Blue Star veggie beds towards the buildings and beds of Damsel Gardens.

This wet meadow was photographed looking north from around point “4”. The mature swamp forest mentioned earlier is on the right.

One characteristic of this farm is its sandy soils, as evidenced here. These are remnants of Glacial Lake Albany beaches (or shallow, submerged sand flats). Making a cameo is one of the numerous grasshoppers we encountered. Most of the time they flushed hurriedly from in front of us, their large wings sometimes fooling us into mistaking them for short-flighted butterflies.

One consequence of the sandy soils seems to be ample habitat for native, ground-nesting bees, such as this Eastern Miner Bee (or close relative).

This graph illustrates data we collected from 19 Columbia County farms back in 2010. In and around tomato beds, we indexed flower abundance (much of which was unplanted “weeds”) and surveyed bees using bowl traps. This graphic shows that, relative to all other farms and especially for those with such low flower abundance, bees were very abundant at the current Blue Star site. Our guess was that this was because the sandy soil made excellent habitat for ground nesting bees. Bee diversity also appeared to be relatively high, ranking fourth in a quick and dirty assessment of diversity. We did not assess flower abundance during our current visit and it may well now be higher.

This native bee may be another species of mining bee.

Many bumble bees are also ground nesters.

The most common bee species observed was the Honey Bee, likely originating from…

these hives along the forest edge. While many of us appreciate the honey, and Honey Bees can definitely be a boon to crop pollination, there is evidence that, at least under certain conditions, they can out compete native bees, thereby reducing the habitat quality for some species. Where native bees are abundant, additional pollinators are usually not needed.

Open sand or clay patches are also favored by tiger beetles. This happens to be a “Punctured Tiger Beetle”, named for the row of point-like indentations along its back.

Speaking of beetles, this is a Green June Beetle, an elegant beetle with a wide-ranging diet, who is sometimes considered a minor agricultural pest.

Most of our attention was focused on dragonflies (& damselflies) and butterflies. We’ll start with the former.

This large dragonfly was seen flying over the aforementioned pond. While the green body and reddish tail could suggest a female Common Green Darner (a species that was also present), the brightness of the red, coupled with an evident white patch below the hind wings (not so evident in this photo, but clearer in others), suggests Comet Darner. Comet Darners are the biggest dragonflies regionally, and they are generally considered rare. We know them from only two other sites in the County.

The vegetation around the pond edge sported numerous darner exuvia – the hollow, dry skins left behind when the aquatic nymph clambers out of the water, unzips its diving suit, and flies away. These appear to be exuvia of the Common Green Darner.

Widow Skimmers are common pond dragonflies that range widely in search of prey.

The Eastern Pond Hawk is another relatively common pond dragonfly. This bright green individual is the female, who has a much more verdant coloration than…

the blueish male shown above. One wonders if she is also more apt to hang out in green vegetation. As the traces of green suggest, the coloration of younger males resembles that of the female in many dragonfly species .

The name “Common Whitetail” almost says it all, but only the males have such white abdomens.

This slightly tattered Blue Dasher female also seems to carry its habitat’s design onto its thorax.

The Blue Dasher male tends to have a blue tail with a black tip.

OK, I admit this is an odd angle. It shows a pair of flying Black Saddlebags from the back. The male is in front and is clasping the female behind the head with his aptly named “claspers”. Unlike Widow Skimmers, Pondhawks, and Blue Dashers, Black Saddlebags rarely perch. Rather than ‘hawking’ after prey from stationary resting points, this species does most of its hunting on the wing. This mated pair is probably not hunting, but rather looking for a place where their eggs can be deposited.

A mature male of one of our red-colored Meadowhawks. We have a trio of similar species and, not having tried to catch and inspect this individual more closely, I won’t guess at a species name.

Damselflies are close relatives of the dragonflies, but are generally smaller, slimmer and hold their wings above their backs when perched. This damselfly is an Eastern Forktail, a common if somewhat inconspicuous species.

A Familiar Bluet. The defining characteristic for many damselflies and dragonflies is often those male claspers mentioned earlier; they are found at the very tip of the tail. Probably because they are an important component of the pairing process, their shape tends to be species-specific.

Damselflies can have exuvia too!

Moving on to butterflies, this is the iconic Monarch. We have seen a scattering of them so far this year.

This is the Viceroy, a Monarch look-alike. It is usually smaller than a Monarch and has that distinctive black line paralleling the trailing edge of the hindwing.

Cabbage Whites were abundant at the farm. As hinted at here, their caterpillars (aka cabbageworms) feed on brassicas and can sometimes be crop pests. Cabbage White are not native, and were first noticed around the ports of Quebec City and New York in the 1860s, probably having hitched a ride on imported cabbages.

Their medium size and bright white wings is almost distinctive. Just to keep things interesting however…

some female sulphur butterflies are white, and so a definitive ID can require a close look. When their wings are closed, sulphurs have a small, brown-outlined eye on their hindwings; Cabbage Whites have no such mark. The tops of the wings are also distinctive but are less commonly seen.

“Skippers” are moth-like butterflies with comparatively large bodies. Their flight is usually hurried, with minimal apparent gliding. This is our largest skipper, the Silver-spotted Skipper. It is a common resident on farms, where its caterpillars feed on various, usually non-commercial legumes.

Butterflies do age. Their wings do not grow back and they progressively lose their scales, hence the tattered, almost translucent wings of this Silver-spotted Skipper.

Another Silver-spotted Skipper, this time in the relatively rare open-wing posture.

We have a host of tiny skippers that often go relatively unnoticed. They can be tricky to ID, so much so that butterfly aficionados call this and two other darkish skipper species the “Three Witches”. This is a male Little Glassywing, or at least so I have convinced myself!

My guess is that this is a female of the same species. These smaller skippers often perch with their wings in a ‘jet-fighter’ position – the hindwing flat and the forewing at an angle.

I believe this slightly drabber-colored species is a Dun Skipper, another one of the witches. Unlike the other two witches, the Dun is a sedge feeder; correspondingly, it tends to be most common around wetter areas.

The bronzy head of this fresh individual is a subtle but useful characteristic for recognizing the Dun Skipper.

Some skipper do, however, perch with their wings flat. In fact, one rarely sees these particular species with their wings closed. This is a Wild Indigo Duskywing, a native butterfly whose caterpillars feed on Wild Indigo. This would currently seem to be a losing strategy in our region – how many times have you seen Wild Indigo? However, species aren’t stupid evolutionarily, and the Wild Indigo Duskwing could now be more aptly named the Vetch Duskywing, having accepted introduced vetches into its diet.

This was the first time I have seen a Common Checkered Skipper for at least a couple of years. We are on the northern edge of this southerly species’ range, and they have not been common locally. It may not overwinter with us and might need to recolonize each summer from farther south. Its caterpillars feed on Velvet Leaf, a farm weed that Sue assured us she has plenty of.

This little beauty is a Pearl Crescent – a small, sometimes common butterfly whose caterpillars feed on asters. They were most common in the flowers between the pond and the forest, but were found throughout the farm.

A mated pair of Pearl Crescents, the larger, more darkly marked female has her wings open.

Crescent taxonomy harbors some confusion. There are probably at least two Crescent species in the County, the widespread Pearl Crescent and the less common Northern Crescent. The distinguishing characteristic is said to be the lack of black dividing lines in the central, orange field of the Northern’s hindwing. So perhaps this is a Northern Crescent, or maybe it’s just a particularly ‘blond’ Pearl Crescent.

Only slightly bigger than a large, female Pearl Crescent, the Meadow Fritillary seems to be declining regionally for reasons unknown. In the 19th century, for example, its range extended throughout Massachusetts, but now it is mainly found in the western part of the State. It has similarly retracted from the surroundings of NYC. One hopes it will not go the way of the Regal Fritillary – a once relatively widely distributed species, now nearly extinct on the East Coast.

The Meadow Frit’s underwing is well camouflaged.

The underwing of this butterfly is also subtle, but, wait a bit and…

the Red Admiral may flash its more dramatic wing tops. Like the Monarch (and a few other of our species), the Red Admiral is migratory.

Do you see the butterfly hiding in this picture?

What about now? This is an Eastern Comma. It is thought that such contrasting coloration of the two sides of the wings might play a role in a startle strategy – come too close and a potential predator gets a surprising flash of orange as its intended prey flies away. Alternatively, perhaps the coloration plays a role in inter-species communication but is best kept under wraps much of the time.

As suggested by the fact we have already seen this hairstreak in our Little Seed Gardens posting, the Grey Hairstreak is probably are most common hairstreak.

A sooty Eastern Tailed-blue female.

Common Ringlets flash their brick orange while flying. Somewhat counterintuitively, this is a northern species which has come south over the past 30 years or so.

This reclusive butterfly was found hugging the edge of the swamp forest. The Appalachian Brown is largely confined to wetlands, where its caterpillars’ food plants – sedges – are found. Unlike some other wetland butterflies, one rarely sees it on field flowers, perhaps because tree sap and animal dung are its more favored adult foods.

A male Black Swallowtail decked with ample ‘scrambled eggs’.

The female has less yellow. This is a native butterfly, but is sometimes considered an agricultural pest on carrots, dill, parsley and other cultivated relatives. Caterpillars also feed on Queen Anne’s Lace.

Butterflies aren’t the only ‘Lepidoptera’ out during the day – several of our moths are also day fliers. These Yellow-collared Scape Moths seem especially common this year. Their caterpillars are reportedly grass and sedge feeders, but the adults seem to love nectaring on a range of flowers.

None of the butterflies we saw at this farm were particularly rare, but their abundance and diversity (18 species) were encouraging. This was probably due in part to the diversity of habitats on the farm, from wet meadow to swamp forest to pasture to pond edge, combined with the ecological farming practices used and the ample space for wild-growing flowers.

The dragonflies and damselflies around the new pond were fairly abundant, especially for a pond that is only a couple of year old. One of the key factors that encourages the diversity of these insects is a lack of fish, and we would discourage their introduction. If it does not completely dry out, there might be additional species of dragonflies in the swamp forest, but we did not venture in during this visit.

Stay tuned for Claudia’s plant contribution.

5 July 2024: Little Seed Farm

by Conrad & Claudia.

Today, we visited Little Seed Gardens on a hot, heavy midday with hazy, overcast skies. Little Seed is located on the west bank of the Stony Kill, and that stream unites with Kinderhook Creek in the northeast corner of the farm. They grow organic veggies and raise Randall Cattle (a rare land race from VT).

This LiDAR image (LiDAR is way of mapping the detailed, small-scale topography from aerial imagery) suggest that almost the entire farm is in the historical floodplain of Kinderhook Creek.

In 1948, the area around Little Seed was somewhat more open, but one of the main differences is the evident movement of the Kinderhook into the northern part of the farm since that year. Aside from that erosion, the northern pasture outline remains largely unchanged, but the smaller fields south of that have been united into a single large field (although, in practice, that is actually divided into a checkerboard of pasture and vegetable beds without large hedgerows).

As roughly indicated by the hot pink arrows, we visited the core of the farm, moving along its southeast edge until we reached the far, currently unoccupied pasture. We then headed northwest, passing by and around some veggie beds, nosing into pasture again before heading east along the hedgerow. We did visit the northern section and the banks of the Kinderhook, although by that time the rain clouds were rolling in.

Little Seed has plenty of loosely tended edges as shown by this photograph taken at point 1 looking southwest. In this picture, there is Common Milkweed, Fleabane and (in the background) Canada Thistle, all in flower.

As this photograph (looking southwest between points 1 and 2) shows, some of the same flowers come in around the veggie beds.

As this picture (taken at point 2 looking northeast), Fleabane is relatively common in the currently unused pasture.

This last landscape shot, taken looking west from around point 3, shows recently grazed pasture on the right and less recently grazed, fleabane-exuberant, pasture on the left.

Zooming in on some of the plants, we found Blue-eyed Grass (Sisyrinchium montanum) flowering in one of the pastures. This native plant (which is not a true grass!) can be found here and there in meadows, where its grass-like leaves blend in until its delightful flower announces its presence.

Another native plant, the Clammy Ground-cherry (Physalis heterophylla) was found in unmowed vegetation along an irrigation line. This is a wild relative of potatoes, tomatoes, eggplants, and peppers.

American Germander (Teucrium canadense) was found in several places along the deer fence surrounding the vegetable fields and also along the edge of the riparian forest of Stony Kill. This species is a native member of the mint family.

The native vine Moonseed (Menispermum canadense) can easily be recognized by its uniquely-shaped leaves with their stalks attached slightly underneath the leaf blade. Here it mingles with the invasive Mugwort (Artemisia vulgaris) on the edge of the riparian forest along Stony Kill.

The native Thin-leaved Sunflower (Helianthus decapetalus) is quite common along the forest edges. It will produce small yellow flower heads later in the summer.

Toringo Crab Apple (Malus sieboldii) is a rapidly-spreading small tree in the north-western part of Columbia County and has been classified as an invasive plant in our region. At Little Seed Gardens, it is the most common woody plant along fence lines. Unfortunately, it still is planted as an ornamental in gardens because of its beautiful white spring bloom. Birds love its small fruit (which turn orange when ripe) and disperse its seeds all over…

Toringo Crab Apple has variably-shaped leaves. These lobed leaves are from a young plant. Branches that flower and bear fruit usually have more simple, unlobed leaves.

Butterflies were not particularly active, perhaps in part due to the overcast conditions. Nonetheless, we saw about one dozen species. I only saw one Monarch. It would not be surprising if they laid eggs on the ample Common Milkweed on the farm.

We have two common species of Sulphurs here – the Clouded and the Orange. The Orange Sulphur often, but not always, flashes egg-yolk orange in flight, both species regularly have white females. This individual? Yes, it’s either a Clouded or an Orange… I’m not placing a bet. The Orange has become notably more common after its caterpillars discovered alfalfa as a food plant.

And one Red Admiral (sorry for the bad photo). Both Monarch and Red Admiral probably do not overwinter in the region, meaning that each year they must recolonize from the south. Both do breed here, but those following generations must head south if they are to survive. Red Admiral caterpillars feed on nettles, which probably occur in the wetlands or stream sides around the farm.

A few Great Spangled Fritillaries flew through during the surveys. We have two or three large fritillary species in the region, but only the Great Spangled as so complete a broad tan band between the silver spots of the hind wing. Their caterpillars are violet feeders.

The little Eastern Tailed-blue is common in our fields. The males are markedly blue on the top, but the females, like this one, are sooty.

Another little butterfly of fields is the American Copper. Ironically, given the name, some now suspect that, at least here in the East, this species was imported early in the period of European colonization.

Claudia spotted this little beauty while doing plant surveys along the edge of the southwest pasture. The Grey Hairstreak is one of our most common hairstreaks (which isn’t saying much given their general rarity as a group). This relative abundance shouldn’t be surprising because, as one guide book noted, their caterpillars “will reportedly eat almost anything”.

Pearl Crescents are relatively small butterflies, marked with orange and black. This pair was inspecting the mud around a former livestock watering spot. It’s thought that they are probably seeking salts deposited in cattle urine.

Another somewhat blurry photo, but good enough for an ID. This is a Black Swallowtail, of which we saw three individuals. These butterflies are occasionally considered pests because their caterpillars feed on members of the carrot family. The local species most likely to be confused with this butterfly is the Spicebush Swallowtail. The Eastern Tiger Swallowtail also has a dark female form, but it is most common to the south.

Skippers are fast-flying, moth-like (because of their big bodies relative to their wings) butterflies. This is our largest skipper, the Silver-spotted Skipper. Its caterpillars feed on a variety of legumes and it can be relatively common in farm fields, although I have not heard of it referred to as a pest on any leguminous crop.

The Northern Broken Dash can be recognized by the ‘3’ outlined in white spots on its hind wing. (OK, so it does take a bit of imagination to see it.) This is one of three small, relatively drab, brownish skippers flying at this time of year. To honor the difficulty of distinguishing them, butterfly folks refer to those species as the “Three Witches”. Just saw a few of these Broken Dashes today.

Here’s the same species starting to open up its wings. Unlike most butterflies, skippers tend to open their wings into a ‘jet fighter’ formation with the hindwing flat, but the forewing at an angle.

Distinctly different, right? Admittedly, skipper ID is something of an art. This is probably a second species of “witch,” the Dun Skipper – the drabbest of the lot, although it often has a vaguely greenish/gold hue to its head. The Dun Skipper caterpillars feed on sedges, while those of the Northern Broken Dash are grass feeders. The third “witch” is another grass feeder, the Little Glasswing. We didn’t see it today, although we did see it earlier in the week at a farm farther south.

The last butterfly for today is this one, caught mid-flight. This is the so-called Question Mark, named for the white dot and arc seen on the underside of its hindwing (and visible here). I only saw this species along the wooded edges. A Least Skipper and probable Cabbage White were also logged but not photographed.

Dragonflies seemed more common, but less diverse than butterflies. Indeed, I noted about 70 of them during the roughly 2 hour survey, but only roughly half that number of butterflies. However, I only ID’d four species of dragonflies vs. roughly a dozen species of butterflies. These are two Widow Skimmers, the most common species I saw during my wanders.

The second most common dragonfly were the Eastern Amberwings (aka ‘Snitches’). These are our smallest butterflies and the golden wings of this individual mark it as a male.

This mottle-winged individual doing a headstand is a female Eastern Amberwing. Males and females often differ markedly in coloration.

Some dragonflies seem to outshine butterflies in terms of color. This is the aptly named Halloween Pennant. Another relatively common dragonfly of grassy fields.

The young of all our dragonflies are aquatic, so these species are probably just visiting the fields for feeding. All of our dragonflies are predators and feed on other insects. These three species (and a fourth, the Blue Dasher) raise their young primarily in still or slow waters, and are probably coming from adjacent ponds or wetlands. The rarest dragonflies on the farm might be found along the Kinderhook, but our time was running out by the time we made it to the Creek. Creek dragonflies seem less likely to spread into adjacent fields.

Fifteen to twenty years ago we also did butterfly surveys at Little Seed. Many of the same ‘suspects’ appeared, but also present were several wetland butterflies – Bronze Copper, Mulberry Wing, and even a Dion Skipper (see shot from Little Seed in July 2010 above, one of only two records we have from Columbia County). Across those surveys, we averaged about 1 butterfly spotted per minute; during yesterday’s surveys, we averaged about half that, largely because we saw much fewer Cabbage Whites.

There are various, non-exclusive explanations for these differences. Foremost, no single day of surveys should be taken as representative. The weather was cloudy and hot yesterday; butterfly activity may have been reduced. Further, butterfly populations can fluctuate markedly across years, because of certain climatic conditions or other factors that boost or bust a given species’ natural history. Generally, this does not seem to have been a good Cabbage White year. Additionally, as a pest species, efforts may have been made on the farm to control this species in particular, although we have not yet talked to Willy and Claudia about that. The relative absence of wetland species might again be chance – each species of butterfly has its own flight calendar and we may have just not hit it right this year (although we know some of those wetlands species are currently flying elsewhere). Alternatively, perhaps some of those wetlands have dried or otherwise been altered – a clue to explore.

Insects rarely provide explicit answers about habitat change but they provide hints and, heck, they can be pretty! (For more on regional butterflies and our recommendations for good field guides, see here.)